To explain the polarization effects,
the scalar description of the signal amplitudes is not adequate as it assume a
single stationary polarization state that cannot be modified by the travel in
the interferometer. We assume a stationary non-polarized light. For
convenience, we define two orthogonal directions x and y which form with z a
complete orthogonal reference system. The propagating light in the all-fiber
interferometer is assumed to be a transverse electromagnetic (TEM) plane wave
orthogonal to the traveling direction z. A vectorial amplitude signal E is then
written in terms of its projection Ex and Ey on the
directions x and y respectively
|
(E-1) |
If q is the polarization angle
difference between the reference and the test light arriving at the detector,
the signal amplitudes Er and Et are given by

|
(E-2) |
where b includes the complete
reflection response of the test sample. The signal amplitude Ed and
intensity Id at the detector are given by

|
(E-3) |
After some algebric manipulations we
obtain
The spectral distribution is identical
for all polarizations (same complex degree of coherence g) and for
non-polarized light, both orthogonal components have half the total source
intensity Is. This allows a reformulation of Id
For q = 0, the
intensity Id corresponds to the case where the polarization effects
are neglected and the interferences are not perturbed. For other values of q, the cosinus
factor reduce the fringe visibility and in the worst case for q = p/2, no
interference at all will be detected.
|